Your Solution Might Be the Problem
When your fix stops working, stop optimizing it. The solution itself may have become the obstacle blocking your actual goal.
When your fix stops working, stop optimizing it. The solution itself may have become the obstacle blocking your actual goal.
When your solution stops working, the instinct is to optimize it harder. Paul Veth argues that is often the wrong move. The solution itself may have become the obstacle. The fix is to trace back to the original goal and ask one question: is what I am doing right now bringing that goal closer?
Paul's first business was a bar on a C-location street in Breda, the third street people reached after the A and B locations filled up. He competed aggressively against neighboring bars for months. The result: everyone on the street lost ground. Winning one weekend meant losing the next. When he stopped competing and approached the other bar owners about working together, foot traffic on the whole street grew significantly. The competitive fight had been the wrong focus all along.
Paul recommends returning to this question every quarter or every year: is this thing I am doing bringing my goal closer? If the answer is unclear or no, that activity may need to be cut, not scaled. His bar example comes back to one sentence: he was there to give people a great time. Everything else, including fighting competitors, was noise around that goal.
Paul references the difference between zero-sum thinking (one winner, one loser) and positive-sum thinking (growing the whole market together). The positive-sum approach almost always works better, as the Breda street example shows. Identity First Marketing, the strategy practice of Paul Veth, applies this same logic: start with the goal, not the tactic.
The clearest signal is that pushing harder on the solution produces no results or makes things worse. Paul Veth recommends going back to the original goal and asking whether your current activity is bringing that goal closer. If not, the solution is the obstacle.
Paul says competition can be a legitimate strategy, but only in the right context. When you are fighting over a fixed pool of customers, everyone loses. Growing the total market with others, including competitors, almost always works better. The bar street example in Breda tripled foot traffic once collaboration replaced competition.
Paul suggests doing this every quarter or at minimum every year. The question is simple: is what I am doing right now bringing my original goal closer? Services, tactics and strategies that cannot answer yes to that question may not belong in the business at all.
Paul uses marketing as an example of a legitimate activity that still becomes noise when it pulls focus away from the core goal. The goal is to solve a problem for a customer. Everything built around that goal, including marketing, only matters if it brings more of the right people closer to that solution.
Want to learn more or collaborate? Feel free to reach out.
Get in touchThe content argues that doubling down on a fix that stopped working is itself the problem. Have you ever caught yourself optimizing something that should have been abandoned entirely, and what made it hard to see that in the moment?